PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 15

10 Mr. Connor asked the Minister for Social Welfare if he will outline using figures in respect of (1) 1988, (2) 1989 and (3) 1990 (a) the details of the number of recipients of disability benefit who were examined by his Department's medical referees, (b) the number of recipients found fit for work as a result of these examinations and (c) the number of disqualified recipients who, on appeal, had benefit restored by the appeals office; his views on whether the referee system is flawed and is seen by many as merely a disqualification and money-saving procedure used by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

30 January 1992

Last action

Status

oral

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

30 January 1992

Summary

10 Mr. Connor asked the Minister for Social Welfare if he will outline using figures in respect of (1) 1988, (2) 1989 and (3) 1990 (a) the details of the number of recipients of disability benefit who were examined by his Department's medical referees, (b) the number of recipients found fit for work as a result of these examinations and (c) the number of disqualified recipients who, on appeal, had benefit restored by the appeals office; his views on whether the referee system is flawed and is seen by many as merely a disqualification and money-saving procedure used by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Social Welfare Benefits.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.