212 Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 100 of 18 April 2012, on the negotiations leading to the revised ESM treaty, if he will elaborate on his statement that he had suggested that before creating any such link between the ESM and stability treaties that careful consideration be given to any possible market implications; if it is the case that he suggested that the failure to include such a link could have led to market instability, or a negative market reaction, or failed to reassure the markets. [22016/12]

Summary

212 Deputy Stephen S. Donnelly asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 100 of 18 April 2012, on the negotiations leading to the revised ESM treaty, if he will elaborate on his statement that he had suggested that before creating any such link between the ESM and stability treaties that careful consideration be given to any possible market implications; if it is the case that he suggested that the failure to include such a link could have led to market instability, or a negative market reaction, or failed to reassure the markets. [22016/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• EU Treaties

  xml · EN · 1 May 2012

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.