PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 155

227 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason, in relation to the number of people who successfully appealed their offer under the Health (Repayment Scheme) Act 2006, they were initially offered a lower amount if they had an clear entitlement to a higher payment as proven by their successful appeal. [18348/08]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 May 2008

Last action

13 May 2008 · Nursing Homes Repayment Scheme.

Status

written

Sponsors

Ring, Michael.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 May 2008

Summary

227 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason, in relation to the number of people who successfully appealed their offer under the Health (Repayment Scheme) Act 2006, they were initially offered a lower amount if they had an clear entitlement to a higher payment as proven by their successful appeal. [18348/08]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 May 2008

    Nursing Homes Repayment Scheme.

    227 Deputy Michael Ring asked the Minister for Health and Children the reason, in relation to the number of people who successfully appealed their offer under the Health (Repayment Scheme) Act 2006, they were initially offered a lower amount if they had an clear entitlement to a higher payment as proven by their successful appeal. [18348/08]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Nursing Homes Repayment Scheme.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Ring, Michael. · Asking member
  • Minister for Health and Children · Minister for Health and Children · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.