PQ 155
155. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice the date on which she requested of the president of the High Court to designate a judge or judges of the High Court to be a relevant judge under the Communications (Retention of Data) (Amendment) Act 2022; the date on which that judge nominated; the persons the judge nominated; if she will clarify whether the alleged threat is present or foreseeable to the security of the State; the assessments that were conducted in respect of the alleged threat; the evidence that was proffered in relation to the alleged threat; the way in which the retention of this data necessary and proportionate to the purposes for which the application was made; if she and or her officials conducted a data protection impact assessment; if she will clarify whether she consulted with other bodies, including but not limited to, the Data Protection Commission and the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission before making this application; and if she will set out the conditions and directions that the relevant judge specify in the order. [33105/23]
Introduced
5 July 2023
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 July 2023
Summary
155. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice the date on which she requested of the president of the High Court to designate a judge or judges of the High Court to be a relevant judge under the Communications (Retention of Data) (Amendment) Act 2022; the date on which that judge nominated; the persons the judge nominated; if she will clarify whether the alleged threat is present or foreseeable to the security of the State; the assessments that were conducted in respect of the alleged threat; the evidence that was proffered in relation to the alleged threat; the way in which the retention of this data necessary and proportionate to the purposes for which the application was made; if she and or her officials conducted a data protection impact assessment; if she will clarify whether she consulted with other bodies, including but not limited to, the Data Protection Commission and the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission before making this application; and if she will set out the conditions and directions that the relevant judge specify in the order. [33105/23]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Communications Surveillance
Communications Surveillance
xml · EN · 5 July 2023
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2023-07-05/155/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2023-07-05/pq_155