PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 155

155. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice the date on which she requested of the president of the High Court to designate a judge or judges of the High Court to be a relevant judge under the Communications (Retention of Data) (Amendment) Act 2022; the date on which that judge nominated; the persons the judge nominated; if she will clarify whether the alleged threat is present or foreseeable to the security of the State; the assessments that were conducted in respect of the alleged threat; the evidence that was proffered in relation to the alleged threat; the way in which the retention of this data necessary and proportionate to the purposes for which the application was made; if she and or her officials conducted a data protection impact assessment; if she will clarify whether she consulted with other bodies, including but not limited to, the Data Protection Commission and the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission before making this application; and if she will set out the conditions and directions that the relevant judge specify in the order. [33105/23]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

5 July 2023

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 July 2023

Summary

155. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Justice the date on which she requested of the president of the High Court to designate a judge or judges of the High Court to be a relevant judge under the Communications (Retention of Data) (Amendment) Act 2022; the date on which that judge nominated; the persons the judge nominated; if she will clarify whether the alleged threat is present or foreseeable to the security of the State; the assessments that were conducted in respect of the alleged threat; the evidence that was proffered in relation to the alleged threat; the way in which the retention of this data necessary and proportionate to the purposes for which the application was made; if she and or her officials conducted a data protection impact assessment; if she will clarify whether she consulted with other bodies, including but not limited to, the Data Protection Commission and the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission before making this application; and if she will set out the conditions and directions that the relevant judge specify in the order. [33105/23]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Communications Surveillance

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.