14 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Labour if his attention has been drawn to the comments made by a district justice in the Dublin District Court on 9 April 1990 when convicting a hairdressing salon of failing to pay statutory wage levels to a trainee hairdresser and failing to keep proper records under the Industrial Relations Act, that the penalties available to him were in no way commensurate with the loss to the injured parties; if he will introduce amending legislation to increase the penalties; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Summary

14 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Minister for Labour if his attention has been drawn to the comments made by a district justice in the Dublin District Court on 9 April 1990 when convicting a hairdressing salon of failing to pay statutory wage levels to a trainee hairdresser and failing to keep proper records under the Industrial Relations Act, that the penalties available to him were in no way commensurate with the loss to the injured parties; if he will introduce amending legislation to increase the penalties; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Hairdressing Salon Court Conviction.

  xml · EN · 23 May 1990

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.