PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 16

16 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Taoiseach if, in relation to comments made by him, he will clarify the view he expressed that the talks between John Hume and Gerry Adams were not linked to any other possible solution; if, in view of his stated wish to reassure Unionists in Northern Ireland, he intends to take any steps to help achieve this; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

6 October 1993

Last action

6 October 1993 · Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Northern Ireland Talks.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Proinsias De Rossa

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

6 October 1993

Summary

16 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Taoiseach if, in relation to comments made by him, he will clarify the view he expressed that the talks between John Hume and Gerry Adams were not linked to any other possible solution; if, in view of his stated wish to reassure Unionists in Northern Ireland, he intends to take any steps to help achieve this; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 6 October 1993

    Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Northern Ireland Talks.

    16 Proinsias De Rossa asked the Taoiseach if, in relation to comments made by him, he will clarify the view he expressed that the talks between John Hume and Gerry Adams were not linked to any other possible solution; if, in view of his stated wish to reassure Unionists in Northern Ireland, he intends to take any steps to help achieve this; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Northern Ireland Talks.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.