255 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the specific quality proofing measures he has in place to ensure he, his officials, agents and servants, in carrying out their responsibilities, comply with the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of the Health Amendment Bill that the State cannot abolish or reduce a right without compensation of not less than the market value and the more recent High Court ruling in the case of (details supplied) that the State cannot renege on its contractual obligations on the basis of objective public interest reasons. [31145/06]

Summary

255 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the specific quality proofing measures he has in place to ensure he, his officials, agents and servants, in carrying out their responsibilities, comply with the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of the Health Amendment Bill that the State cannot abolish or reduce a right without compensation of not less than the market value and the more recent High Court ruling in the case of (details supplied) that the State cannot renege on its contractual obligations on the basis of objective public interest reasons. [31145/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Court Rulings.

  xml · EN · 4 October 2006

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.