Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 1655

1655. Deputy Frankie Feighan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the Research Ireland (RI) criteria for applications deemed 'high-risk' and the reasons for rejection without any constructive feedback on same (details supplied); the criteria for qualifications of those tasked to approve the applications relevant to the application itself; the RI policy, if any, in terms of awarding funding to technical universities (TUs) versus more established universities in Dublin/Galway, or if there are plans to re-open a ring-fenced funding option for TUs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29797/25]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

10 June 2025

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 June 2025

Summary

1655. Deputy Frankie Feighan asked the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science the Research Ireland (RI) criteria for applications deemed 'high-risk' and the reasons for rejection without any constructive feedback on same (details supplied); the criteria for qualifications of those tasked to approve the applications relevant to the application itself; the RI policy, if any, in terms of awarding funding to technical universities (TUs) versus more established universities in Dublin/Galway, or if there are plans to re-open a ring-fenced funding option for TUs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29797/25]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Research Funding

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.