PQ 169
169. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Health why a report promised in a reply to a Parliamentary Question in February 2015 has not been published; his views on the review of costs undertaken and its conclusions; and if he agrees with the former Minister who stated the review would lead to good practice and value for money actions being embedded within spending for care in Health Service Executive nursing homes. [18666/16]
Introduced
29 June 2016
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
29 June 2016
Summary
169. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Health why a report promised in a reply to a Parliamentary Question in February 2015 has not been published; his views on the review of costs undertaken and its conclusions; and if he agrees with the former Minister who stated the review would lead to good practice and value for money actions being embedded within spending for care in Health Service Executive nursing homes. [18666/16]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Nursing Homes Support Scheme Administration
Nursing Homes Support Scheme Administration
xml · EN · 29 June 2016
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2016-06-29/169/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2016-06-29/pq_169