PQ 170
197 Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the reason he did not rescind the recent special severance gratuity payment agreed by the Top Level Appointments Committee to the former Secretary General of the Department of the Taoiseach, in view of the fact that this payment, which is clearly defined in section 7 of the Superannuation and Pensions Act 1963 as being a special severance gratuity, could only have been awarded to this person on the instruction of the Minister. [24888/11]
Introduced
20 September 2011
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 September 2011
Summary
197 Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the reason he did not rescind the recent special severance gratuity payment agreed by the Top Level Appointments Committee to the former Secretary General of the Department of the Taoiseach, in view of the fact that this payment, which is clearly defined in section 7 of the Superannuation and Pensions Act 1963 as being a special severance gratuity, could only have been awarded to this person on the instruction of the Minister. [24888/11]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Pension Provisions
Pension Provisions
xml · EN · 20 September 2011
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2011-09-20/170/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2011-09-20/pq_170