Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 170

197 Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the reason he did not rescind the recent special severance gratuity payment agreed by the Top Level Appointments Committee to the former Secretary General of the Department of the Taoiseach, in view of the fact that this payment, which is clearly defined in section 7 of the Superannuation and Pensions Act 1963 as being a special severance gratuity, could only have been awarded to this person on the instruction of the Minister. [24888/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

20 September 2011

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

20 September 2011

Summary

197 Deputy Mary Lou McDonald asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the reason he did not rescind the recent special severance gratuity payment agreed by the Top Level Appointments Committee to the former Secretary General of the Department of the Taoiseach, in view of the fact that this payment, which is clearly defined in section 7 of the Superannuation and Pensions Act 1963 as being a special severance gratuity, could only have been awarded to this person on the instruction of the Minister. [24888/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Pension Provisions

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.