PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 170

170. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her views on the 2012 investigation in the United Kingdom into a company (details supplied), which forms part of one of the JobPath providers, and that alleges widespread and systemic fraud within that company; further to Parliamentary Question No. 89 of 17 November 2015, if she is aware that the investigations into fraud were carried out internally by the company that, according to testimony to the Public Accounts Committee in the United Kingdom, is characterised by unethical behaviour, mismanagement and inadequate corporate governance and risk management. [42750/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

1 December 2015

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 December 2015

Summary

170. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her views on the 2012 investigation in the United Kingdom into a company (details supplied), which forms part of one of the JobPath providers, and that alleges widespread and systemic fraud within that company; further to Parliamentary Question No. 89 of 17 November 2015, if she is aware that the investigations into fraud were carried out internally by the company that, according to testimony to the Public Accounts Committee in the United Kingdom, is characterised by unethical behaviour, mismanagement and inadequate corporate governance and risk management. [42750/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Contracts

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.