PQ 171
171 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason he continues to appeal a decision of the High Court, currently in proceedings before the Supreme Court, effectively striking down the original terms of the redress board on the basis that persons between the ages of 18 and 21 years could not seek redress, and in view of the publication of the Ryan report and the need to address the concerns of all victims within the context of the religious institutions concerned; if he will withdraw his appeal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26842/09]
Introduced
2 July 2009
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
2 July 2009
Summary
171 Deputy Brian Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason he continues to appeal a decision of the High Court, currently in proceedings before the Supreme Court, effectively striking down the original terms of the redress board on the basis that persons between the ages of 18 and 21 years could not seek redress, and in view of the publication of the Ryan report and the need to address the concerns of all victims within the context of the religious institutions concerned; if he will withdraw his appeal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26842/09]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Residential Institutions Redress Scheme.
Residential Institutions Redress Scheme.
xml · EN · 2 July 2009
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2009-07-02/171/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2009-07-02/pq_171