PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 1720

1720. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if his attention has been drawn to the case of a person (details supplied); if there is any redress for former members of the Defence Forces who were not part of a personal injury compensation scheme within the timeframe stated of six months; if so, the criteria which would need to be fulfilled; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41233/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

17 January 2017

Last action

17 January 2017 · Defence Forces Veterans

Status

written

Sponsors

Cullinane, David.

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

17 January 2017

Defence

Summary

1720. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if his attention has been drawn to the case of a person (details supplied); if there is any redress for former members of the Defence Forces who were not part of a personal injury compensation scheme within the timeframe stated of six months; if so, the criteria which would need to be fulfilled; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41233/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 17 January 2017

    Defence Forces Veterans

    1720. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Taoiseach and Minister for Defence if his attention has been drawn to the case of a person (details supplied); if there is any redress for former members of the Defence Forces who were not part of a personal injury compensation scheme within the timeframe stated of six months; if so, the criteria which would need to be fulfilled; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [41233/16]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Defence Forces Veterans

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.