PQ 174
167 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance the way in which a company and a sub lessor, as explained in a recent court case, was able to avail of capital allowances in respect of the National Aquatic Centre of over €2 million per annum up to a total value of €34 million despite this being a public project 100% financed by the State at a cost of over €60 million; if his attention has been drawn to costs relating to this project, or companies associated with it, which would give rise to capital allowances; the tax provision under which this could arise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14156/06]
Introduced
6 April 2006
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
6 April 2006
Summary
167 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance the way in which a company and a sub lessor, as explained in a recent court case, was able to avail of capital allowances in respect of the National Aquatic Centre of over €2 million per annum up to a total value of €34 million despite this being a public project 100% financed by the State at a cost of over €60 million; if his attention has been drawn to costs relating to this project, or companies associated with it, which would give rise to capital allowances; the tax provision under which this could arise; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14156/06]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Tax Code.
Tax Code.
xml · EN · 6 April 2006
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2006-04-06/174/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2006-04-06/pq_174