Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 179

182 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason Ireland’s second report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child refers to the administrative procedures in place for family reunification for migrants not covered under the Refugee Act 1996 but does not identify, or address, the implementation of said procedures; his views that the Government’s policy of denying visas to the minor children of parents granted leave to remain violates Articles 9 and 10 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37361/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

1 December 2005

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 December 2005

Summary

182 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason Ireland’s second report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child refers to the administrative procedures in place for family reunification for migrants not covered under the Refugee Act 1996 but does not identify, or address, the implementation of said procedures; his views that the Government’s policy of denying visas to the minor children of parents granted leave to remain violates Articles 9 and 10 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37361/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Children’s Rights.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.