Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 179

179. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 57 of 5 July 2017, his views on whether the debt refinancing loan sale Project Nantes relating to a company (details supplied) may have constituted a substantial loss to the taxpayer; if the loans related to Project Nantes were sold for €26.6 million and had a nominal value of €352 million; if his attention has been drawn to a conflict of interest with regard to the company that purchased the loans and the original debtor; if he will make immediate enquiries with NAMA in relation to this sale; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32695/18]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 July 2018

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

24 July 2018

Summary

179. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 57 of 5 July 2017, his views on whether the debt refinancing loan sale Project Nantes relating to a company (details supplied) may have constituted a substantial loss to the taxpayer; if the loans related to Project Nantes were sold for €26.6 million and had a nominal value of €352 million; if his attention has been drawn to a conflict of interest with regard to the company that purchased the loans and the original debtor; if he will make immediate enquiries with NAMA in relation to this sale; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [32695/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

NAMA Transactions

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.