Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 182

182. Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the amount spent during 2016 by his Department, and by each named public body under his Department’s remit, on legal services, by reference to each firm or individual engaged in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8041/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 February 2017

Last action

16 February 2017 · Departmental Legal Costs

Status

written

Sponsors

John Deasy

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 February 2017

Summary

182. Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the amount spent during 2016 by his Department, and by each named public body under his Department’s remit, on legal services, by reference to each firm or individual engaged in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8041/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 February 2017

    Departmental Legal Costs

    182. Deputy John Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the amount spent during 2016 by his Department, and by each named public body under his Department’s remit, on legal services, by reference to each firm or individual engaged in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8041/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Legal Costs

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • John Deasy · Asking member
  • Foreign · Foreign · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.