PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 183

184 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if, given that the real problem in a case was that a bogus address was used on the grant application (details supplied) in the first place, his views on whether this was a mistake or a misunderstanding due to townland boundary definition difficulties; and his further views on whether there was never any need for Údarás to take any steps given that the said townland boundary, mapped the same now as it has been since pre-Famine times, is fully visible and definable along its entire length in this area by a solid 6 ft high stone wall with a number of large boulders in it. [8668/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 March 2006

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 March 2006

Summary

184 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if, given that the real problem in a case was that a bogus address was used on the grant application (details supplied) in the first place, his views on whether this was a mistake or a misunderstanding due to townland boundary definition difficulties; and his further views on whether there was never any need for Údarás to take any steps given that the said townland boundary, mapped the same now as it has been since pre-Famine times, is fully visible and definable along its entire length in this area by a solid 6 ft high stone wall with a number of large boulders in it. [8668/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Grant Payments.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.