PQ 192
192. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Minister for Finance why the Revenue Commissioners do not consider the seaweed bath business to be entitled to the 9% value added tax rate, which was introduced specifically for the tourism business; if the list of businesses which the Revenue Commissioners oversee will be updated in order to allow tourism-focused businesses to obtain the reduced rate of value added tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42344/15]
Introduced
1 December 2015
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
1 December 2015
Summary
192. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Minister for Finance why the Revenue Commissioners do not consider the seaweed bath business to be entitled to the 9% value added tax rate, which was introduced specifically for the tourism business; if the list of businesses which the Revenue Commissioners oversee will be updated in order to allow tourism-focused businesses to obtain the reduced rate of value added tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42344/15]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
VAT Rate Application
VAT Rate Application
xml · EN · 1 December 2015
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2015-12-01/192/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2015-12-01/pq_192