PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 192

192. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Minister for Finance why the Revenue Commissioners do not consider the seaweed bath business to be entitled to the 9% value added tax rate, which was introduced specifically for the tourism business; if the list of businesses which the Revenue Commissioners oversee will be updated in order to allow tourism-focused businesses to obtain the reduced rate of value added tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42344/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

1 December 2015

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 December 2015

Summary

192. Deputy Tony McLoughlin asked the Minister for Finance why the Revenue Commissioners do not consider the seaweed bath business to be entitled to the 9% value added tax rate, which was introduced specifically for the tourism business; if the list of businesses which the Revenue Commissioners oversee will be updated in order to allow tourism-focused businesses to obtain the reduced rate of value added tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [42344/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

VAT Rate Application

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.