Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 193

205 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on the need for regulation of the on-line gaming sector; the state of preparedness for his proposals for the regulator and the taxation of this sector; when it is expected that legislation will be published on the matter. [22411/10]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

26 May 2010

Last action

26 May 2010 · Gaming Industry

Status

written

Sponsors

Richard Bruton

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

26 May 2010

Taxation

Summary

205 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on the need for regulation of the on-line gaming sector; the state of preparedness for his proposals for the regulator and the taxation of this sector; when it is expected that legislation will be published on the matter. [22411/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 26 May 2010

    Gaming Industry

    205 Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on the need for regulation of the on-line gaming sector; the state of preparedness for his proposals for the regulator and the taxation of this sector; when it is expected that legislation will be published on the matter. [22411/10]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Gaming Industry

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Richard Bruton · Asking member
  • Minister for Justice · Minister for Justice · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.