PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 194

281 Deputy Micheál Martin asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he now accepts that the 2008 NCCA report called the Modern Language in the Primary School Curriculum Feasibility and Futures November 2008 did not in fact recommend ending the MLPSI and that the NCCA in fact supports the MLPSI and believes it should be continued; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25052/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

22 May 2012

Last action

22 May 2012 · Languages Programme

Status

written

Sponsors

Martin, Micheál.

Subjects

Education

Source updated

22 May 2012

Education

Summary

281 Deputy Micheál Martin asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he now accepts that the 2008 NCCA report called the Modern Language in the Primary School Curriculum Feasibility and Futures November 2008 did not in fact recommend ending the MLPSI and that the NCCA in fact supports the MLPSI and believes it should be continued; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25052/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 May 2012

    Languages Programme

    281 Deputy Micheál Martin asked the Minister for Education and Skills if he now accepts that the 2008 NCCA report called the Modern Language in the Primary School Curriculum Feasibility and Futures November 2008 did not in fact recommend ending the MLPSI and that the NCCA in fact supports the MLPSI and believes it should be continued; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25052/12]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Languages Programme

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Martin, Micheál. · Asking member
  • Minister for Education and Skills · Minister for Education and Skills · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.