196. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Health if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the terms of report No. 42 with regard to higher remuneration in public service were not applied to a small number of former health board officials who transferred to the HSE in 2005, some of whom are still employed by the HSE, while others have retired; the justification for this; the action he plans to take in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4719/18]

Summary

196. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Health if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the terms of report No. 42 with regard to higher remuneration in public service were not applied to a small number of former health board officials who transferred to the HSE in 2005, some of whom are still employed by the HSE, while others have retired; the justification for this; the action he plans to take in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4719/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 31 January 2018

   HSE Staff Remuneration

   196. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Health if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the terms of report No. 42 with regard to higher remuneration in public service were not applied to a small number of former health board officials who transferred to the HSE in 2005, some of whom are still employed by the HSE, while others have retired; the justification for this; the action he plans to take in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4719/18]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• HSE Staff Remuneration

  xml · EN · 31 January 2018

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• O'Dea, Willie. · Asking member
• Health · Health · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.