Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 196

196. Deputy Mairéad Farrell asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if there is no constitutional justification for failing to provide for the extension of the evidential protections of European Union directive 2017/1937 reversal of the burden of proof with respect to causation to those whistle-blowers with litigation currently before the courts (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38456/22]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 July 2022

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 July 2022

Summary

196. Deputy Mairéad Farrell asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if there is no constitutional justification for failing to provide for the extension of the evidential protections of European Union directive 2017/1937 reversal of the burden of proof with respect to causation to those whistle-blowers with litigation currently before the courts (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38456/22]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Protected Disclosures

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.