PQ 196
196. Deputy Mairéad Farrell asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if there is no constitutional justification for failing to provide for the extension of the evidential protections of European Union directive 2017/1937 reversal of the burden of proof with respect to causation to those whistle-blowers with litigation currently before the courts (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38456/22]
Introduced
13 July 2022
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
13 July 2022
Summary
196. Deputy Mairéad Farrell asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if there is no constitutional justification for failing to provide for the extension of the evidential protections of European Union directive 2017/1937 reversal of the burden of proof with respect to causation to those whistle-blowers with litigation currently before the courts (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38456/22]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Protected Disclosures
Protected Disclosures
xml · EN · 13 July 2022
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2022-07-13/196/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2022-07-13/pq_196