Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 196

196. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the number of applications for the tenant in situ scheme from both tenants and landlords, for each local authority for each of the past five years; the number of successful applications where the tenancy was acquired by the local authority; the number of tenancies where the local authority refused to acquire the property; the reasons for not doing so; the number of cases where a landlord or property owner refused to sell to each local authority; the reasons stated for not doing so, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45762/23]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

18 October 2023

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

18 October 2023

Summary

196. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the number of applications for the tenant in situ scheme from both tenants and landlords, for each local authority for each of the past five years; the number of successful applications where the tenancy was acquired by the local authority; the number of tenancies where the local authority refused to acquire the property; the reasons for not doing so; the number of cases where a landlord or property owner refused to sell to each local authority; the reasons stated for not doing so, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45762/23]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Housing Schemes

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.