PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 198

216 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress that has been made in the verification process of additional institutions to be added to the Schedule to the Residential Institutions Redress Act 2002; when a list of additional institutions will be brought before Dáil Éireann for approval; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16593/04]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

1 June 2004

Last action

1 June 2004 · Residential Institutions Redress Scheme.

Status

written

Sponsors

Enright, Olwyn.

Subjects

Education

Source updated

1 June 2004

Education

Summary

216 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress that has been made in the verification process of additional institutions to be added to the Schedule to the Residential Institutions Redress Act 2002; when a list of additional institutions will be brought before Dáil Éireann for approval; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16593/04]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 1 June 2004

    Residential Institutions Redress Scheme.

    216 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress that has been made in the verification process of additional institutions to be added to the Schedule to the Residential Institutions Redress Act 2002; when a list of additional institutions will be brought before Dáil Éireann for approval; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16593/04]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Residential Institutions Redress Scheme.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Enright, Olwyn. · Asking member
  • Minister for Education and Science · Minister for Education and Science · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.