PQ 199
255 Deputy Jim O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Finance the reason the duty drawback relief which on 9 December 2009 was to be made available to those holding stocks of alcoholic drinks was withdrawn, giving rise to substantial losses to those holding such stocks, even though a methodology had been agreed with the Revenue Commissioners for the taking and the verification of such stocks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1050/10]
Introduced
19 January 2010
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
19 January 2010
Summary
255 Deputy Jim O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Finance the reason the duty drawback relief which on 9 December 2009 was to be made available to those holding stocks of alcoholic drinks was withdrawn, giving rise to substantial losses to those holding such stocks, even though a methodology had been agreed with the Revenue Commissioners for the taking and the verification of such stocks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1050/10]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Excise Duty.
Excise Duty.
xml · EN · 19 January 2010
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2010-01-19/199/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2010-01-19/pq_199