Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 2

3 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government his views on whether democracy would be better served and the integrity of the planning process enhanced by the immediate abolition of the ?20 charge to lodge a formal planning objection. [24066/02]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 November 2002

Last action

28 November 2002 · Ceisteanna – Questions. - Planning Applications.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Ciarán Cuffe

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

28 November 2002

Environment

Summary

3 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government his views on whether democracy would be better served and the integrity of the planning process enhanced by the immediate abolition of the ?20 charge to lodge a formal planning objection. [24066/02]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 28 November 2002

    Ceisteanna – Questions. - Planning Applications.

    3 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government his views on whether democracy would be better served and the integrity of the planning process enhanced by the immediate abolition of the ?20 charge to lodge a formal planning objection. [24066/02]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ceisteanna – Questions. - Planning Applications.

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Ciarán Cuffe · Asking member
  • Minister for the Environment and Local Government · Minister for the Environment and Local Government · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.