20. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question No. 132 of 9 June 2015, and in view of the fact that the case has been ongoing for over 40 years and that the relevant clause under which the person was retired from the Army has been removed since 1985, the reason he has to further delay matters by consulting the Attorney General before initiating a review of the matter. [25093/15]

Summary

20. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question No. 132 of 9 June 2015, and in view of the fact that the case has been ongoing for over 40 years and that the relevant clause under which the person was retired from the Army has been removed since 1985, the reason he has to further delay matters by consulting the Attorney General before initiating a review of the matter. [25093/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Defence Forces Personnel

  xml · EN · 25 June 2015

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.