PQ 200
227 Deputy Maureen O’Sullivan asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, having regard to the objective of reuniting dormant account holders and policyholders or their next of kin with their dormant funds and unclaimed policies in credit institutions and insurance undertakings, the current reserve within the dormant accounts fund against future claims; the way this level of reserve compares to dormant accounts funds internationally; if any consideration has been or is being given to revising the level of reserve; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12307/11]
Introduced
24 May 2011
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
24 May 2011
Summary
227 Deputy Maureen O’Sullivan asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, having regard to the objective of reuniting dormant account holders and policyholders or their next of kin with their dormant funds and unclaimed policies in credit institutions and insurance undertakings, the current reserve within the dormant accounts fund against future claims; the way this level of reserve compares to dormant accounts funds internationally; if any consideration has been or is being given to revising the level of reserve; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12307/11]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Dormant Accounts Fund
Dormant Accounts Fund
xml · EN · 24 May 2011
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2011-05-24/200/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2011-05-24/pq_200