PQ 201
201. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if her Department has sought legal advice in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 11 who is 67 years of age, living alone and in receipt of a private pension only, as distinct from a single person in near-identical circumstances who is in receipt of a qualifying payment and a private pension; the reason why the scheme is set up so that in these circumstances, the person of higher means is deemed eligible, and the person with lower means is not; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [37646/15]
Introduced
3 November 2015
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
3 November 2015
Summary
201. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if her Department has sought legal advice in the case of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 11 who is 67 years of age, living alone and in receipt of a private pension only, as distinct from a single person in near-identical circumstances who is in receipt of a qualifying payment and a private pension; the reason why the scheme is set up so that in these circumstances, the person of higher means is deemed eligible, and the person with lower means is not; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [37646/15]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Pension Provisions
Pension Provisions
xml · EN · 3 November 2015
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2015-11-03/201/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2015-11-03/pq_201