PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 202

232 Deputy Michael Kennedy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills if her attention has been drawn to the fact that more than €250,000 has been spent on renting prefabs over the past ten years for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; when this school will receive the permanent buildings that it requires; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [20761/10]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

19 May 2010

Last action

19 May 2010 · Schools Building Projects

Status

written

Sponsors

Kennedy, Michael.

Subjects

Education

Source updated

19 May 2010

Education

Summary

232 Deputy Michael Kennedy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills if her attention has been drawn to the fact that more than €250,000 has been spent on renting prefabs over the past ten years for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; when this school will receive the permanent buildings that it requires; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [20761/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 May 2010

    Schools Building Projects

    232 Deputy Michael Kennedy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills if her attention has been drawn to the fact that more than €250,000 has been spent on renting prefabs over the past ten years for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; when this school will receive the permanent buildings that it requires; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [20761/10]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Schools Building Projects

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Kennedy, Michael. · Asking member
  • Minister for Education · Minister for Education · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.