PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 204

193 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 722 of 12 April 2005, the reason a person’s spouse (details supplied) was granted a re-entry visa while their passport and permission to remain in the State was due to expire on the same date as their passport and permitted time to remain in the State; the way in which two different decisions were arrived at based upon the same particulars in respect of authorised permission to remain in the State and the valid dates of passports in view of the fact that they have now been authorised to remain in the State until 21 February 2008; if he will take steps to ensure that a re-entry visa is granted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12619/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

21 April 2005

Last action

21 April 2005 · Visa Applications.

Status

written

Sponsors

Penrose, Willie.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

21 April 2005

Summary

193 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 722 of 12 April 2005, the reason a person’s spouse (details supplied) was granted a re-entry visa while their passport and permission to remain in the State was due to expire on the same date as their passport and permitted time to remain in the State; the way in which two different decisions were arrived at based upon the same particulars in respect of authorised permission to remain in the State and the valid dates of passports in view of the fact that they have now been authorised to remain in the State until 21 February 2008; if he will take steps to ensure that a re-entry visa is granted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12619/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 21 April 2005

    Visa Applications.

    193 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 722 of 12 April 2005, the reason a person’s spouse (details supplied) was granted a re-entry visa while their passport and permission to remain in the State was due to expire on the same date as their passport and permitted time to remain in the State; the way in which two different decisions were arrived at based upon the same particulars in respect of authorised permission to remain in the State and the valid dates of passports in view of the fact that they have now been authorised to remain in the State until 21 February 2008; if he will take steps to ensure that a re-entry visa is granted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12619/05]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Visa Applications.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Penrose, Willie. · Asking member
  • Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform · Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.