PQ 204
201 Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if it was intended in the architectural heritage protection guidelines for local authorities that a structure must be of regional interest to warrant consideration for entry in the record of protected structures; if local authorities are intended to be discouraged or precluded from considering for entry in the record of protected structures, any structure of local interest or exceptional local interest, but falling short of regional interest; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45090/09]
Introduced
3 December 2009
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
3 December 2009
Summary
201 Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if it was intended in the architectural heritage protection guidelines for local authorities that a structure must be of regional interest to warrant consideration for entry in the record of protected structures; if local authorities are intended to be discouraged or precluded from considering for entry in the record of protected structures, any structure of local interest or exceptional local interest, but falling short of regional interest; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45090/09]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Architectural Heritage.
Architectural Heritage.
xml · EN · 3 December 2009
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2009-12-03/204/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2009-12-03/pq_204