Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 205

205. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Health the number of complaints received regarding general practitioners charging for routine phlebotomy services each year since 2009, in tabular form; the number of refunds issued for routine phlebotomy services in each of the CHO areas each year since 2009, in tabular form; the total value of these refunds per CHO area for each year since 2009, in tabular form; and the number of general practitioners each year since 2009 who have had money deducted by the HSE after the HSE ruled the general practitioners in question incorrectly charged for routine phlebotomy services. [30436/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 June 2017

Last action

—

Status

written

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 June 2017

Summary

205. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Health the number of complaints received regarding general practitioners charging for routine phlebotomy services each year since 2009, in tabular form; the number of refunds issued for routine phlebotomy services in each of the CHO areas each year since 2009, in tabular form; the total value of these refunds per CHO area for each year since 2009, in tabular form; and the number of general practitioners each year since 2009 who have had money deducted by the HSE after the HSE ruled the general practitioners in question incorrectly charged for routine phlebotomy services. [30436/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

General Practitioner Services

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.