PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 206

205 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the decision by the High Court in Germany which ordered a return to the ballot box dismissing the country’s electronic voting machines as out of keeping with the principle of fair and open elections; and if he will support this view here. [10768/09]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 March 2009

Last action

12 March 2009 · Election Management System.

Status

written

Sponsors

McGrath, Finian.

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

12 March 2009

Environment

Summary

205 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the decision by the High Court in Germany which ordered a return to the ballot box dismissing the country’s electronic voting machines as out of keeping with the principle of fair and open elections; and if he will support this view here. [10768/09]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 March 2009

    Election Management System.

    205 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the decision by the High Court in Germany which ordered a return to the ballot box dismissing the country’s electronic voting machines as out of keeping with the principle of fair and open elections; and if he will support this view here. [10768/09]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Election Management System.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • McGrath, Finian. · Asking member
  • Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.