PQ 206
206. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport why the 17A bus route is mentioned as being retained as an orbital route, but the orbital 220 route is not mentioned under the new transport plan for Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16344/16]
Introduced
15 June 2016
Last action
15 June 2016 · Dublin Bus Services
Status
written
Sponsors
Chambers, Jack.
Subjects
Transport
Source updated
15 June 2016
Summary
206. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport why the 17A bus route is mentioned as being retained as an orbital route, but the orbital 220 route is not mentioned under the new transport plan for Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16344/16]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
15 June 2016
Dublin Bus Services
206. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport why the 17A bus route is mentioned as being retained as an orbital route, but the orbital 220 route is not mentioned under the new transport plan for Dublin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16344/16]
Source: written
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Dublin Bus Services
Dublin Bus Services
xml · EN · 15 June 2016
Sponsors
- Chambers, Jack. · Asking member
- Transport · Transport · Addressed to
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2016-06-15/206/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2016-06-15/pq_206
- ireland · q-2016-06-15-pq_206 · source updated 15 June 2016