PQ 209
210 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on whether the promotion of women’s human rights here is a fundamental necessity for the progressive development of this nation; his further views on whether such a task requires an independent women’s human rights organisation; and if he will consider reinstating core funding for the Women’s Human Rights Project, now the Women’s Human Rights Alliance, in budget 2005 under the equality for women measure of the national development plan to enable them to pursue their strategic plan for 2004-08. [23120/04]
Introduced
30 September 2004
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
30 September 2004
Summary
210 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his views on whether the promotion of women’s human rights here is a fundamental necessity for the progressive development of this nation; his further views on whether such a task requires an independent women’s human rights organisation; and if he will consider reinstating core funding for the Women’s Human Rights Project, now the Women’s Human Rights Alliance, in budget 2005 under the equality for women measure of the national development plan to enable them to pursue their strategic plan for 2004-08. [23120/04]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Human Rights Issues.
Human Rights Issues.
xml · EN · 30 September 2004
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2004-09-30/209/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2004-09-30/pq_209