PQ 209
249 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason the selection criteria for the new prison complex planned to replace Mountjoy changed again at the last meeting, specifically with regard to the proximity to public transportation, which had been a more important factor up to the meeting of 18 January 2005; and the reason all sites were previously ruled out because they had scored badly on the proximity to public transport criteria were not reconsidered positively in view of the proposal to run a private shuttle bus service to the new prison. [8084/05]
Introduced
9 March 2005
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
9 March 2005
Summary
249 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason the selection criteria for the new prison complex planned to replace Mountjoy changed again at the last meeting, specifically with regard to the proximity to public transportation, which had been a more important factor up to the meeting of 18 January 2005; and the reason all sites were previously ruled out because they had scored badly on the proximity to public transport criteria were not reconsidered positively in view of the proposal to run a private shuttle bus service to the new prison. [8084/05]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Prisons Building Programme.
Prisons Building Programme.
xml · EN · 9 March 2005
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2005-03-09/209/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2005-03-09/pq_209