PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 209

245 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children, further to Parliamentary Question No. 156 of 26 January 2005, the reason there is not a proactive follow-up by the consultants who examined the person (details supplied) in County Carlow; if a full programme of treatment and care for this person will be implemented; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10548/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 April 2005

Last action

12 April 2005 · Health Services.

Status

written

Sponsors

John McGuinness

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

12 April 2005

Summary

245 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children, further to Parliamentary Question No. 156 of 26 January 2005, the reason there is not a proactive follow-up by the consultants who examined the person (details supplied) in County Carlow; if a full programme of treatment and care for this person will be implemented; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10548/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 April 2005

    Health Services.

    245 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children, further to Parliamentary Question No. 156 of 26 January 2005, the reason there is not a proactive follow-up by the consultants who examined the person (details supplied) in County Carlow; if a full programme of treatment and care for this person will be implemented; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [10548/05]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Health Services.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • John McGuinness · Asking member
  • Minister for Health · Minister for Health · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.