137 Mr. Shatter asked the Minister for Equality and Law Reform whether he intends by way of legislation to implement the provisions formerly contained in the Matrimonial Home Bill which were intended to amend the Family Home Protection Act, 1976, the Married Women's Status Act, 1957, which did not provide for automatic joint ownership of the family home and which were not found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

Summary

137 Mr. Shatter asked the Minister for Equality and Law Reform whether he intends by way of legislation to implement the provisions formerly contained in the Matrimonial Home Bill which were intended to amend the Family Home Protection Act, 1976, the Married Women's Status Act, 1957, which did not provide for automatic joint ownership of the family home and which were not found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 22 February 1994

   Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Family Home Ownership.

   137 Mr. Shatter asked the Minister for Equality and Law Reform whether he intends by way of legislation to implement the provisions formerly contained in the Matrimonial Home Bill which were intended to amend the Family Home Protection Act, 1976, the Married Women's Status Act, 1957, which did not provide for automatic joint ownership of the family home and which were not found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

   Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Family Home Ownership.

  xml · EN · 22 February 1994

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Alan Shatter · Asking member
• Minister for Equality and Law Reform · Minister for Equality and Law Reform · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.