PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 21

65 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the cost to date of the electronic voting machines; when and the way the Government will dispose of the machines; if there is a case for compensation from the manufacturer who provided the equipment and software; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37700/10]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

19 October 2010

Last action

19 October 2010 · Electronic Voting Machines

Status

oral

Sponsors

James Bannon

Subjects

Environment

Source updated

19 October 2010

Environment

Summary

65 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the cost to date of the electronic voting machines; when and the way the Government will dispose of the machines; if there is a case for compensation from the manufacturer who provided the equipment and software; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37700/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 October 2010

    Electronic Voting Machines

    65 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the cost to date of the electronic voting machines; when and the way the Government will dispose of the machines; if there is a case for compensation from the manufacturer who provided the equipment and software; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37700/10]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Electronic Voting Machines

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • James Bannon · Asking member
  • Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.