PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 211

211. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Defence the total cost to fill the 600 vacant army personnel in the Permanent Defence Forces and to maintain the agreed Permanent Defence Force strength of 9,500; if he will clarify in his previous reply his statement that the recruitment will be achieved within the resource envelope allocated to Defence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46643/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 October 2012

Last action

24 October 2012 · Defence Forces Recruitment

Status

written

Sponsors

O'Sullivan, Maureen.

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

24 October 2012

Defence

Summary

211. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Defence the total cost to fill the 600 vacant army personnel in the Permanent Defence Forces and to maintain the agreed Permanent Defence Force strength of 9,500; if he will clarify in his previous reply his statement that the recruitment will be achieved within the resource envelope allocated to Defence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46643/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 October 2012

    Defence Forces Recruitment

    211. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Defence the total cost to fill the 600 vacant army personnel in the Permanent Defence Forces and to maintain the agreed Permanent Defence Force strength of 9,500; if he will clarify in his previous reply his statement that the recruitment will be achieved within the resource envelope allocated to Defence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46643/12]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Defence Forces Recruitment

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.