PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 213

215 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, further to Parliamentary Question No. 168 of 6 October 2011, if he will confirm that incontrovertible evidence of the ownership of the property in the form of land registry deeds has been received by officers of his Department; if he accepts that regardless of any dispute, land registry deeds and not copy of probate is proof of ownership and that any dispute can have no bearing on the current position; if he will further set out the extent to which he proposes to review the position in view of these facts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29307/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

13 October 2011

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

13 October 2011

Summary

215 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, further to Parliamentary Question No. 168 of 6 October 2011, if he will confirm that incontrovertible evidence of the ownership of the property in the form of land registry deeds has been received by officers of his Department; if he accepts that regardless of any dispute, land registry deeds and not copy of probate is proof of ownership and that any dispute can have no bearing on the current position; if he will further set out the extent to which he proposes to review the position in view of these facts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29307/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Registration of Title

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.