PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 22

Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Transport his views on the need for a no-strike clause on essential transport services as a result of the effect of the unofficial strike in Irish Rail, causing mayhem and disruption for thousands of passengers, adversely affecting the economy and showing no regard whatsoever to the travelling public and the taxpayer.

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

27 May 2008

Last action

27 May 2008 · Dispute in Irish Rail.

Status

oral

Sponsors

O'Dowd, Fergus.

Subjects

Transport

Source updated

27 May 2008

Transport

Summary

Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Transport his views on the need for a no-strike clause on essential transport services as a result of the effect of the unofficial strike in Irish Rail, causing mayhem and disruption for thousands of passengers, adversely affecting the economy and showing no regard whatsoever to the travelling public and the taxpayer.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 27 May 2008

    Dispute in Irish Rail.

    Deputy Fergus O’Dowd asked the Minister for Transport his views on the need for a no-strike clause on essential transport services as a result of the effect of the unofficial strike in Irish Rail, causing mayhem and disruption for thousands of passengers, adversely affecting the economy and showing no regard whatsoever to the travelling public and the taxpayer.

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Dispute in Irish Rail.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • O'Dowd, Fergus. · Asking member
  • Minister for Transport · Minister for Transport · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.