PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 22

22. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if, in the event of an investigation that may be initiated following the report and review relating to two protected disclosures (details supplied), she will consider suspending the Garda Commissioner, in view of the fact that she might have control of much of the information required; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40426/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

16 December 2016

Last action

16 December 2016 · Protected Disclosures

Status

written

Sponsors

Wallace, Mick.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 December 2016

Summary

22. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if, in the event of an investigation that may be initiated following the report and review relating to two protected disclosures (details supplied), she will consider suspending the Garda Commissioner, in view of the fact that she might have control of much of the information required; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40426/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 16 December 2016

    Protected Disclosures

    22. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality if, in the event of an investigation that may be initiated following the report and review relating to two protected disclosures (details supplied), she will consider suspending the Garda Commissioner, in view of the fact that she might have control of much of the information required; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [40426/16]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Protected Disclosures

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.