PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 22

22. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 713 of 17 January 2017, the details of the types of future State use being considered by his Department for the vacant State-owned properties on the list; if there are plans to repurpose any of the buildings for social housing or emergency accommodation usage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3421/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

26 January 2017

Last action

26 January 2017 · State Properties

Status

written

Sponsors

Wallace, Mick.

Subjects

Housing

Source updated

26 January 2017

Housing

Summary

22. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 713 of 17 January 2017, the details of the types of future State use being considered by his Department for the vacant State-owned properties on the list; if there are plans to repurpose any of the buildings for social housing or emergency accommodation usage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3421/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 26 January 2017

    State Properties

    22. Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform further to Parliamentary Question No. 713 of 17 January 2017, the details of the types of future State use being considered by his Department for the vacant State-owned properties on the list; if there are plans to repurpose any of the buildings for social housing or emergency accommodation usage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3421/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

State Properties

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.