223. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the reason the Revenue Commissioners did not include the various provisions of section 110 in the published list of tax expenditures published on their website when the section clearly provides various extraordinary and unusual forms of relief (details supplied); if he will now provide the tax cost of the tax expenditures granted under section 110; and if, in future, the Revenue Commissioners' statistics unit will provide a complete and comprehensive list of tax expenditures and their costings. [24645/16]

Summary

223. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance the reason the Revenue Commissioners did not include the various provisions of section 110 in the published list of tax expenditures published on their website when the section clearly provides various extraordinary and unusual forms of relief (details supplied); if he will now provide the tax cost of the tax expenditures granted under section 110; and if, in future, the Revenue Commissioners' statistics unit will provide a complete and comprehensive list of tax expenditures and their costings. [24645/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Tax Reliefs Costs

  xml · EN · 16 September 2016

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.