PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 224

235 Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the number of appeals lodged against each of the proposed special protection area designations in Connemara; when it is proposed to have the preliminary appeals decided; the estimated time before he will make a final decision on the proposal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31873/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 November 2011

Last action

2 November 2011 · Wildlife Protection

Status

written

Sponsors

Ó Cuív, Éamon.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 November 2011

Summary

235 Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the number of appeals lodged against each of the proposed special protection area designations in Connemara; when it is proposed to have the preliminary appeals decided; the estimated time before he will make a final decision on the proposal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31873/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 November 2011

    Wildlife Protection

    235 Deputy Éamon Ó Cuív asked the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the number of appeals lodged against each of the proposed special protection area designations in Connemara; when it is proposed to have the preliminary appeals decided; the estimated time before he will make a final decision on the proposal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31873/11]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Wildlife Protection

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Ó Cuív, Éamon. · Asking member
  • Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht · Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.