PQ 229
256 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on whether there are parallels between, on one hand, the 19th century colonial exercise of the 1884 redivision of Africa and the simultaneous America for the Americans doctrine and, on the other, the contemporary redrawing of the economic map of Africa in EPAs and the parallel negotiation by the US of the free trade areas of the Americas. [14160/05]
Introduced
4 May 2005
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
4 May 2005
Summary
256 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on whether there are parallels between, on one hand, the 19th century colonial exercise of the 1884 redivision of Africa and the simultaneous America for the Americans doctrine and, on the other, the contemporary redrawing of the economic map of Africa in EPAs and the parallel negotiation by the US of the free trade areas of the Americas. [14160/05]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Economic Partnership Agreements.
Economic Partnership Agreements.
xml · EN · 4 May 2005
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2005-05-04/229/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2005-05-04/pq_229