82 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the evidence of a person (details supplied) at the Goldsmith inquiry into the invasion of Iraq, that a consensus of legal opinion held that going to war in Iraq was a clear breach of international law, and that in so far as statements by the then Taoiseach to Dáil Éireann, in relation to the Iraq war, relied on similar materials and arguments as those used by then British Prime Minister, his further views on whether the answers to questions, and the discussion of motions in Dáil Éireann, was also relying on false information. [7163/10]

Summary

82 Deputy Jack Wall asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs his views on the evidence of a person (details supplied) at the Goldsmith inquiry into the invasion of Iraq, that a consensus of legal opinion held that going to war in Iraq was a clear breach of international law, and that in so far as statements by the then Taoiseach to Dáil Éireann, in relation to the Iraq war, relied on similar materials and arguments as those used by then British Prime Minister, his further views on whether the answers to questions, and the discussion of motions in Dáil Éireann, was also relying on false information. [7163/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Foreign Conflicts.

  xml · EN · 16 February 2010

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.